Rhetorical Argumentation: The Copenhagen School

Authors

Christian Kock, University of Copenhagen; Marcus Lantz, Roskilde University; Mette Bengtsson; Jonas Gabrielsen; David R. Gruber; Sine Nørholm Just; Charlotte Jørgensen; Mathias Møllebæk; Frederik Appel Olsen; Merete Onsberg; Pamela Pietrucci; Christina Pontoppidan; Rasmus Rønlev

Synopsis

Aristotle taught us that rhetoric is centered around deliberation, and he emphasized that we may only deliberate about things that we can in fact undertake (Rhetoric, 1357a, and elsewhere, mainly in the ethical works). Rhetorical argumentation is, in its essence, the bedrock of such deliberation: It provides the reasons for and against various choices, which we exchange when, in some human collective, we are to decide on a course of action. To be sure, not all rhetoric is argumentation. But all deliberative discourse uses rhetoric, and in such discourse rhetorical argumentation is central (and should be, we might add). Hence, we have found it in place to present a collection of work that revolves around the conception of rhetorical argumentation just outlined and asserts the centrality of that notion in any theory of argumentation.

Chapters

  • Introduction
    Christian Kock, Marcus Lantz
  • Debate for Better or Worse: Hostility in Public Debate
    Charlotte Jørgensen
  • The Difference between the Rhetorical and the Philosophical Concepts of Argumentation
    Christian Kock
  • For Deliberative Disagreement: Its Venues, Varieties and Values
    Christian Kock
  • In Search of the Productive Place(s) of Rhetoric: Outlining a Rhetorical-topical Argument Model for Argument Invention
    Christina Pontoppidan
  • The Danish Debate About Prostitution: Some Characteristics
    Merete Onsberg
  • The Roar in the Comment Section: How Journalists Mediate Public Opinion on the Danish Online Newspaper politiken.dk
    Rasmus Rønlev
  • Affecting Argumentative Action: The Temporality of Decisive Emotion
    Marcus Lantz
  • Persuasive Figures: Harnessing Stasis Theory for Rhetorical Criticism
    Jonas Gabrielsen, Sine Nørholm Just
  • The Second Persona in Political Commentary
    Mette Bengtsson
  • Arguing Against Argumentation in Science: Paul Feyerabend's Polemical Scholarship in "Against Method" and its Lasting Queer
    Frederik Appel Olsen
  • Sniff the Air and Settle In: Bullshit, Rhetorical Listening, and the Copenhagen School's Approach to Despicable Nonsense
    David R. Gruber
  • Paper Tigers in the Clinic? Rhetorical Argument Fields in Health Policy Implementation
    Mathias Møllebæk
  • Muzzling Science? Cultivating Scientists' Rhetorical Awareness in the Public Communication of Expertise for an Era of Pandemic Fatigue
    Pamela Pietrucci
Rhetorical Argumentation cover with two hands holding several chat bubbles.

Downloads

Published

July 5, 2023

Categories

Details about the available publication format: PDF

PDF

ISBN-13 (15)

978-0-920233-99-3

Date of first publication (11)

2023-07-01

Details about the available publication format: Print

Print

ISBN-13 (15)

978-0-920233-98-6

Date of first publication (11)

2023-07-01

Physical Dimensions

6mm x 9mm